<H1> Strasbourg Observers </H1> |
<H1> ‘Appearance of impartiality’: how should the courts reason in the presence of external pressure? </H1> |
<H1> Inadmissibility of evidence obtained by private persons through the use of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment: the case of Ćwik v. Poland </H1> |
<H1> OOO Regnum v. Russia: extending reputational rights to legal entities? </H1> |
<H1> The Challenges of Saying ‘I do’ for same-sex couples: The Human Rights Centre submits a Third Party Intervention in transnational same-sex marriage case </H1> |
<H1> Aghdgomelashvili and Japaridze v Georgia: a further step in the direction of Article 3’s dignitarian promise? </H1> |
<H1> New publication: Coercive Human Rights – Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law under the ECHR </H1> |
<H1> European Court of Human Rights single-judge decisions (still) deny justice and risk weakening UN treaty body system </H1> |
<H1> The case of Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania: the first Grand Chamber judgment on article 1 of Protocol Nr. 7 ECHR (procedural safeguards with regard to expulsion of aliens) </H1> |
<H1> A camel’s nose under the tent: the Court’s failure to discuss evidence in B.G. and Others v France </H1> |
<H1> An Endeavor Towards More Situational Positive Obligations Stemming from Article 2: Case of Kotilainen and others v. Finland </H1> |
<H1> Privacy International and others v United Kingdom: Hacking Admissibility Decision and the Risk of ‘Deference Ping Pong’ </H1> |
<H1> Catch 22: The Interim Measures of the European Court of Human Rights in the Conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan </H1> |
<H1> Systematic push back of ‘well behaving’ asylum seekers at the Polish border: M.K. and Others v. Poland </H1> |
<H1> Placing gender equality in the workplace at the forefront of social rights in Europe: equal pay and equal opportunities under the scrutiny of the European Committee of Social Rights. </H1> |
<H1> Substantive equality as the driving force behind reasonable accommodations for pupils with disabilities: the case of G.L. v. Italy </H1> |
<H1> European Court President Spano’s Visit to Turkey and Its Repercussions </H1> |
<H1> Living with HIV/AIDS in Prison: Segregation and Othering Endorsed by the ECtHR in Dikaiou v Greece </H1> |
<H1> A right to regularize unlawful residence? Pormes v. Netherlands untangled </H1> |
<H1> The Strasbourg Court Establishes Standards on Blocking Access to Websites </H1> |
<H1> Irony in Court: Marina v. Romania </H1> |
<H1> The Lithuanian saga of limiting evidence in trials – the genesis and new cases </H1> |
<H1> Defamation proceedings against Romanian MEP over anti-corruption comments violated Article 10 </H1> |
<H1> Mugemangango v. Belgium: finally a Grand Chamber judgment on post-election disputes. </H1> |
<H1> The Miners’ Raid of June 1990 and the Questionable Execution of the Judgment in the Case of Mocanu and Others v. Romania </H1> |
<H1> The Bitter Price of Being an Inactive Parent: Lyapin v. Russia </H1> |
<H1> Strasbourg v Kafka: Diplomatic Immunity of the Judges of the European Court of Human Rights </H1> |
<H1> Baldassi & Others v. France: Article 10 protects the right to call for a boycott of goods from Israel </H1> |
<H1> Molla Sali v. Greece: a pyrrhic victory following just satisfaction judgment? </H1> |
<H1> Regulating Signals intelligence </H1> |
<H1> Human Rights Centre submits a third party intervention in case concerning the right to family life of transgender parents and their children </H1> |
<H1> Beshiri et al. v. Albania: a nail in the coffin for compensation claims for properties nationalized during the communist regime in Albania? </H1> |
<H1> The Grand Chamber Judgment in S.M. v Croatia: Human Trafficking, Prostitution and the Definitional Scope of Article 4 ECHR </H1> |
<H1> Remembering Paula Marckx </H1> |
<H1> An Azeri kills an Armenian soldier at a NATO training in Budapest: the ECtHR decides a rare case of State responsibility and presidential pardon </H1> |
<H1> No Room for Homophobic Hate Speech Under the EHCR: Carl Jóhann Lilliendahl v. Iceland </H1> |
<H1> Event Announcement: Conference “The ECHR turns 70: Taking Stock, Thinking Forward” postponed to 24-26 November 2021 </H1> |
<H1> The Recent ECtHR Judgment Kövesi v. Romania. Reactions of Romanian Authorities and Implications regarding the Rule of Law </H1> |
<H1> (One More) Engaged Father(s) Before the ECtHR: Uzbyakov v Russia </H1> |
<H1> Advisory Opinion No. 2: a Slightly Bigger Rodent </H1> |
<H1> Social media and applications to the ECtHR: connecting people in the name of human rights? </H1> |
<H1> Pedersen et al v. Norway: Progress towards child-centrism at the European Court of Human Rights? </H1> |
<H1> Strasbourg Observers has got a new logo, we hope you like it! </H1> |
<H1> Announcement: Webinar “Human Rights of Migrants, COVID 19 and the ECHR” (2 June 2020) </H1> |
<H1> The ECHR and the right to have a criminal record and a drink-drive history erased </H1> |
<H1> Access to healthcare and social distance during COVID pandemic cannot stop at the prison gate </H1> |
<H1> ATV ZRT v. Hungary: a missed opportunity to address Hungary’s oppressive Media Act </H1> |
<H1> Herd Immunity and Lockdown: The Legitimacy of National Policies Against the Pandemic and Judicial Self-Restraint by the ECtHR </H1> |
<H1> Reaching the dead-end: M.N. and others and the question of humanitarian visas </H1> |
<H1> ‘Tell me your story, but hurry up because I have to expel you’ – Asady and Others v. Slovakia: how to (quickly) conduct individual interviews and (not) apply the ND & NT “own culpable conduct” test to collective expulsions </H1> |
<H1> Indiscriminate Covid-19 location tracking (Part II): Can pandemic-related derogations be an opportunity to circumvent Strasbourg’s scrutiny? </H1> |
<H1> Post navigation </H1> |
<H1> On Strasbourg Observers </H1> |
<H1> Email Subscription </H1> |
<H1> Editors </H1> |
<H1> Search </H1> |
<H1> Search by Topic or Case </H1> |
<H1> Blog Stats </H1> |
<H1> Archives </H1> |
<H2> </H2> |
<H3> Introduction </H3> |
Social
Social Data
I costi e le spese generali hanno reso questa forma di comunicazione semi-pubblica irrealizzabile.
Ma i progressi della tecnologia di social networking del 2004-2010 hanno reso possibili concetti di condivisione più ampi.